Short communication: 2024 Vol: 16 Issue: 7
Quinoline Derivatives Containing Substituted Piperazine Moieties as Potential Anti-Breast Cancer Agents
Muthiah Gnana Ruba Priya1*, Viswas Raja Solomon2, Nagarajan Hemavathy3, Jeyaraman Jeyakanthan3, Dileep Kumar4,5, Jahnavi Mahesh5
1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, India
2Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Sangareddy, India
3Department of Bioinformatics, University of Alagappa, Karaikudi, India
4Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, USA
5Department of Pharmacy, Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Pune, India
- Corresponding Author:
- Muthiah Gnana Ruba Priya
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, India
Received: 15-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. JOCPR-24-141767; Editor assigned: 18-Jul-2024, PreQC No. JOCPR-24- 141767 (PQ); Reviewed: 01-Aug-2024, QC No. JOCPR-24-141767; Revised: 08-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. JOCPR- 24-14167 (R); Published: 15-Aug-2024, DOI:10.37532/0975-7384.2024.16(7).171
Citation: Priya MGR, et al. 2024. Quinoline Derivatives Containing Substituted Piperazine Moieties as Potential Anti- Breast Cancer Agents. J. Chem Pharm. Res. 16:171.
Copyright: © 2024 Priya MGR, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, providedthe originalauthor and source are credited.
Abstract
Quinoline derivatives have been found to be promising candidates for breast cancer treatment. In this study, we focus on synthesizing new quinolines with substituted piperazine moieties to target EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor), an important therapeutic target in breast cancer therapy. The synthesized quinoline compounds (8a-8i) were characterized by Infrared (IR), Mass Spectrometry (MSS), and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The molecular docking studies indicated that the syntheses have a strong binding affinity towards the EGF receptor target site, with compound 8i exhibiting the highest binding affinity. This study highlights the potential of quinoline derivatives with substituting piperazines as potential anti-breast cancer agents.
Keywords
Quinoline; EGFR; Breast cancer
Description
Quinoline derivatives are recognized for their medicinal properties, especially in cancer treatment. However, issues such as drug resistance and toxicity limit their therapeutic use [1]. Quinoline-containing compounds have displayed an impressive array of biological properties over the years. The study focuses on synthesizing new quinoline derivatives with substituted piperazine moieties to target EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor), an important therapeutic target in breast cancer treatment [2-6]. EGFR inhibitors are known to play a significant role in controlling cancer cell proliferation. Quinoline is classified as a heterocyclic molecule since it has two neighboring carbon atoms fused to an arene in its double-ring structure have a wide range of pharmacological activities like anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, antimalarial, anti-leishmanial and anticancer [7,8]. In recent research, it was shown that quinoline and its derivatives can inhibit tyrosine kinase, topoisomerase and DHODH kinase. Quinoline derivatives are increasingly used as anticancer drugs in pharmaceutical chemistry. The study employs a multi-faceted approach:
Synthesis and structural elucidation
The novel quinoline derivatives (8a-8i) were synthesized and their structures confirmed using IR, MASS, and NMR spectroscopy [9].
Molecular docking
Docking studies were performed to evaluate the binding affinity of the synthesized compounds at the ATP binding site of EGFR. Compounds showed promising docking scores and MM/GBSA energy values [10]. Subsequently, the newly identified synthesized compounds (8a-8i) in this study that were biologically assessed for their inhibitory action against EGFR kinases were subjected to SP-docking using the Glide module of the Schrodinger Suite (Schrodinger Release2023-2: Glide, Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021.
In vitro evaluation
The MTT test technique evaluated the chemically produced compounds in vitro cytotoxicity [11]. The colorimetric MTT metabolic activity test was utilized to assess cell viability against the MCF7 breast cancer andMCF12A normal epithelial cell lines [12-14]. The anticancer activity was tested against MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. The EGFR-TK enzyme inhibition was assessed, with compound 8i showing the highest inhibition rate at 87.5%. The response parameter was determined by calculating the IC50 values, or the concentration needed to lower cell lifespan by 50% [15,16].
In vivo study
The efficacy of compound 8i was further tested in a DMBA-induced rat model, confirming its potential as an anti- breast cancer agent. They were conducted on 6 healthy female wistar rats [17]. This study's foundation was provided by acute toxicity tests, which showed the drug's great therapeutic efficacy, non-toxic makeup, capacity to offset. Different substances cause oxidative stress and inflammation in rats.
The molecular docking studies indicated that the synthesized quinoline derivatives have a strong binding affinity towards the EGFR target site, with compound 8i exhibiting the highest binding affinity [18,19]. The in vitro studies supported these findings, showing that compound 8i effectively inhibits the EGFR-TK enzyme, thus preventing cancer cell proliferation. In vivo studies reinforced the potential of compound 8i, demonstrating significant anti-breast cancer activity in the DMBA-induced rat model. The electron-donating groups in compound 8i are suggested to enhance its interaction with biological targets, contributing to its efficacy [20].
Conclusion
This study highlights the potential of quinoline derivatives with substituted piperazine moieties as promising candidates for breast cancer treatment. Compound 8i, in particular, shows substantial promise due to its high binding affinity, significant EGFR-TK inhibition and effective anti-breast cancer activity in both in vitro and in vivo models. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to explore its full potential and therapeutic applicability. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to synthesize substituted 5-(4-chloroquinolin-3-yl)-methylidene)-2-(piperazin-1- yl)-1,3-thiazol-4(5H)-ones, denoted as 8a-i. The chemical structures of these compounds were analyzed using IR, Mass Spectrum, and proton NMR spectroscopy. Since the EGFR pathway has been linked to the development and spread of several malignancies, including breast cancer, we used a chemical technique in DMBA-induced models of breast cancer to examine compound 8i's effects on the EGFR pathway. Overall, the research indicates the viability of using chemical 8i as a focused treatment approach for breast cancer.
Implications
The findings of this study provide a valuable foundation for the development of more effective quinoline-based anticancer agents. By targeting EGFR with high specificity, these compounds could offer improved treatment outcomes with reduced side effects, addressing a critical need in breast cancer therapy.
Acknowledgment
We extend our sincere gratitude to the College of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Dayananda Sagar University, Karnataka, India, for their support in our research, which was sponsored by DSU.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Giri VN, Knudsen KE, Kelly WK, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(4):414-424.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Rudolph A, Chang-Claude J, Schmidt MK. Br J Cancer. 2016;114(2):125-133.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Choi YJ, Myung SK, Lee JH. Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(2):474-487.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zhao Y, Jian W, Gao W, et al. Cancer Cell Int. 2013;13(1):23.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Wroblewski LE, Peek Jr RM, Wilson KT. Clin Microbiol Rev.2010;23(4):713-739.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Chan CK, Aimagambetova G, Ukybassova T, et al. J Oncol. 2019;2019(1):3257939.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Montella L, Sarno F, Ambrosino A, et al. Cells. 2021;10(8):1909.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Tabassum R, Ashfaq M, Oku H. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2021;21(10):1152-1172.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Vu T, Claret FX. Front Oncol. 2012;2:62.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Gannon A, et al. Oncologist. 2017;22(1):41-52.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Ranjbar-Karimi R, Poorfreidoni A. Drug Res. 2018;68(01):17-22.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hamama WS, Ibrahim ME, Gooda AA, et al. J Heterocycl Chem. 2018;55(11):2623-2634.
- Kalaria PN, Karad SC, Raval DK. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;158:917-936.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Upadhyay A, Chandrakar P, Gupta S, et al. J Med Chem. 2019;62(11):5655-5671.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Jain S, Chandra V, Jain PK, et al. Arab J Chem. 2019;12(8):4920-4946.
- Karnik KS, Sarkate AP, Tiwari SV, et al. Bioorg Chem. 2021;115:105226.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Elbadawi MM, Eldehna WM, Wang W, et al. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;215:113261.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Parikh P, Ghate M, Vyas VK. Med Chem Res 2015;24:4078-4092.
- Guardiola S, Varese M, Sanchez-Navarro M, et al. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(12):941-955.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]